Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MultiGulper

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

=[[MultiGulper]]=

:{{la|MultiGulper}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|MultiGulper}})

Contested PROD. Article about a piece of software lacking evidence the subject satisfies the general notability guideline. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=MultiGulper Speedied as spam] after creation by User:Multigulper. Recreated by an SPA after User:Multigulper was blocked. -- Rrburke (talk) 23:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Sources don't meet notability threshold, and SPA origin suggests probable spam. Dialectric (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. According to their [http://multigulper.com/news own news], the software is still in beta. -- Whpq (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.