Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munawar-abad

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Dusti^{talk to me} 17:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[Munawar-abad]]=

:{{la|Munawar-abad}} ([{{fullurl:Munawar-abad|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munawar-abad}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:ORG Fall en An gel 00:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep and improve. The article isn't very well written, but this is a town in India. Pburka (talk) 01:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy keep It is a town in India. Clearly meets notability. WP:ORG does not apply and WP:RS cannot be used as a reason to delete an article about a geographic location. --- Taroaldo (talk) 07:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep and improve. Towns/villages are inherently notable. What's with applying WP:ORG? Not as silly as applying WP:PORNBIO, but its still a strange red herring argument. --Oakshade (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep Article badly needs cleanup and sourcing, but towns are inherently notable. Edward321 (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.