Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murat Sağlam

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Editors are advised not to move the article to mainspace until/unless the player meets WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 04:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Murat Sağlam]]=

:{{la|Murat Sağlam}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murat_Sa%C4%9Flam Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Murat Sağlam}})

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid as his only appearance for Fenerbahçe to date has been a cup match against Kırklarelispor, a non-FPL club. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Comment Seems to be a fair amount of recent media coverage - perhaps since the Prod. Like [https://www.aksam.com.tr/spor/murat-saglam-kimdir-murat-saglam-fenerbahce-transferi-gerceklesti/haber-980956 this] and shorter pieces such as [https://www.sporx.com/murat-saglam-iyi-macti-zevk-aldim-SXHBQ831067SXQ this]. I can't see the previously deleted version of the article - can you User:Sir Sputnik restore the edit history? Thanks - Nfitz (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

::There's nothing to restore that isn't already part of the article in its current form, apart from a Transfermarkt reference, which as an unreliable source obviously doesn't contribute to notability. The prose of the current article are a verbatim copy of the deleted one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

:::Nonetheless, please restore it User:Sir Sputnik - I'm not aware of any reason not to do so, if there's nothing suppressed. Nfitz (talk)

::::However, there's also no reason to do so here, as the primary reason for undeletion, restoration of content, doesn't apply. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

:::::Where there any other creators/significant editors other than User:Isik; if so were they notified? Nfitz (talk) 01:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

::::::No, there is nothing of relevance in the deleted history. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:08, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 21:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Draftify or Userfy as such a player will likely debut in near future anyway. --BlameRuiner (talk) 12:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Draft Although GNG and NFooty are not met I don't see anything wrong with adding it to draft space. Govvy (talk) 17:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Draftify He is contracted to a WP:FPL club so the potential to be eligible by WP:NFOOTY is there so for now I would put it into draft until he makes a professional league debut. HawkAussie (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.