Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Lakhvinder Cheema

:{{la|Murder of Lakhvinder Cheema}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Murder of Lakhvinder Cheema}})

Unremarkable murder case. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

• Keep Breadth of coverage and diversity of sources indicates this event satisfies the general notability guideline. Exok (talk) 21:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
• Comment I refrained from participating in this discussion due to the outrageous personal attack previously seen above.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murder_of_Lakhvinder_Cheema&oldid=469528587] The proposer refused to remove this but an admin has now done so instead. In addition to the attack the proposer has also listed a further notable article I created for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rekha_Kumari-Baker and generally been following me around on Wikipedia.--Shakehandsman (talk) 21:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Highly notable and unusual murder by poisoning. In the talk page Talk:Murder_of_Lakhvinder_Cheema user:AFW even highlights mentions in The Lancet.--Shakehandsman (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
• Keep With all the reliable international newspaper coverage listed, the subject passes muster with flying colours! Seems to be a time-wasting AfD. Mind you, useful information is missing from the article's intro, for example 'Where?' and 'When?', but that is no grounds for deletion, of course. Sionk (talk) 21:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

• Keep - reliable sources, unusual murder, waste-of-space AfD.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - unusual murder, notable, well covered. Also dubious reasons for afd nom per Shakehandsman above. Keristrasza (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
• Keep per GNG. Cusop Dingle (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.