Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murdoch Marketing

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:51, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Murdoch Marketing]]=

:{{la|Murdoch Marketing}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murdoch_Marketing Stats])

:({{Find sources|Murdoch Marketing}})

Apparently non-notable company. Proposed deletion was declined by {{user|C Inglish}} without comment. Article creator's username ({{user|Murdoch M}} indicates conflict of interest. Brainy J (previously Atlantima) ~✿~ (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete company appears non-notable. Article is kinda spammy too for good measure. Calidum Sistere 22:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete company is not notable per WP:CORP Sherwood10 (talk) 15:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.