Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murray Lundberg

:{{la|Murray Lundberg}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murray_Lundberg Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Murray Lundberg}})

non notable author: Two books, one in 6 libraries, the other in only 2. DGG ( talk ) 20:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete: fails WP:AUTHOR. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:AUTHOR -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete; no evidence of passing either WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. A writer gets a Wikipedia article when he's the subject of enough reliable source coverage in media to pass our inclusion and sourcing rules — but Lundberg is the author, not the subject, of both of the references here, and even in a ProQuest search all I can find is six glancing namechecks of his existence as a giver of soundbite in articles about other things. That's not the depth of RS coverage that it takes, and people do not get to self-publish their own "referencing" about themselves. Bearcat (talk) 16:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.