Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Action Committee

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy.  Sandstein  07:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[Muslim Action Committee]]=

:{{la|Muslim Action Committee}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Muslim_Action_Committee Stats])

:({{Find sources|Muslim Action Committee}})

failure to find substantial notable references; mentioned in passing and mostly 6 years ago. Jason from nyc (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. A fairly old article and topic; a void where reliable sources should be found. With this topic having been so prominent at the time, I'm surprised and, when coupled with its failure to meet notability guidelines, think this should be deleted. dci | TALK 03:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. AutomaticStrikeout 22:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep as per [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7086623.stm several] [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/4844634.stm bbc] [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_midlands/4844562.stm sources]. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Merge to Mohammed cartoons. There were three or four BBC articles around the time of the controversy, when this group was organizing protests, but there's no evidence of a single drop of coverage outside of that. What this amounts to is essentially news that took place around these protests; but WP:NOTNEWS. It may warrant a sentence or two in the article about the controversy, however, since there clearly was significant coverage. --Batard0 (talk) 14:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Merge - not enough notability to merit its own article, but worth mentioning in Mohammed cartoons. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:04, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Merge The group itself doesn't appear to have updated their blog in over four years, but the sources listed do give the group at least enough notability to be mentioned in the Mohammed cartoons article. Sidatio (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • merge as above (changed form keep above). Stuartyeates (talk) 04:05, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.