Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutter (window manager)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Good call Nyttend but you could have closed the AFD :) Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Mutter (window manager)]]=

:{{la|Mutter (window manager)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutter (window manager)}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Mutter (window manager)}})

No real assertion of notability (one mention on google that might indicate some low level notability) as well as blatant copyvio (see [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mutter%20combines%20a%20sophisticated%20display%20engine%20using%20the%20Clutter%20toolkit%22] [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22While%20Mutter%20can%20be%20used%20stand-alone%2C%20it%20is%20primarily%20intended%22][http://www.google.com/search?q=%22reason%2C%20Mutter%20is%20very%20extensible%20via%20plugins%2C%20which%20are%20used%22]. →ROUX ₪ 07:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete - WP:COPYVIO. The article has been blatantly copied and pasted from posts on the Bugzilla development forum. Such as [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318# here] for example - you'll need to scroll down the forum to find them. --Kudpung (talk) 08:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: I didn't speedy it as a copyvio because I honestly don't know whether this is notable enough to be kept or not. If it is, presumably it can be chopped down to something non-copyvio and expanded from there. if not, I figure this discussion will unearth that and it'll go anyway. → ROUX ₪ 08:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as unambiguous copyvio. I've tagged the page as CSD because the copyvio is so blatant it should override AfD. Per Kudpung, one needs to scroll down to near the end of the forum post dated 2009-07-16 18:12:06 EDT to see the copyvio source. Jimmy Pitt talk 09:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Or look at the three Google results I posted in the nom :) → ROUX ₪ 09:43, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Deleted as a copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 14:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.