Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Angel My Teacher (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This was heading for a WP:SNOW deletion, and the fact of it being a recreation after a previous deletion discussion means there is even less reason to wait. JBW (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

=[[:My Angel My Teacher]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Angel My Teacher}}

:{{la|My Angel My Teacher}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=My Angel My Teacher}})

Reliable sources have no significant coverage and no evidence of satisfaction Chief Minister (Talk) 18:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Delete- I agree to the nomination, only source is IMDB which is not suitable per WP:IMDB, however, the article has only been up for a few minutes. I will revisit later and change this to delete if there have not been any changes. Given the outcome of the last AfD for this article, that seems unlikely. A S U K I T E 18:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Update: changed to delete per above, per nom and in agreement with Ab207, G4 may have been prudent in this case and it does not meet WP:NFILM. A S U K I T E 23:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Draftify I think it can be improved in draftspace, but it needs a lot more references and content before it can be put back into mainspace. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 18:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Does not meet WP:NFILM. Draftifying is not helpful because the film is already deemed non-notable which is unlikely to change without new sources. WP:G4 may be applied. Ab207 (talk) 18:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete - still no evidence of significant coverage, failing WP:GNG, and does not meet any of the criteria for WP:NFILM Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Delete as non-notable. Isn't this G4 speediable, even? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete: I see no significant changes in the article, in fact this version looks more or less the same to the one deleted in 2020 as a result of a discussion. The times of india is probably the only reliable source that has talked about this film. It failed WP:NFILM before, and still does so now. Should be speedily deleted under WP:G4.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.