Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Dao method

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=My Dao method}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=My Dao method}})

I cannot find anything to suggest this topic is notable, and it reads entirely like a promotional piece. Fails WP:GNG CoconutOctopus talk 22:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. CoconutOctopus talk 22:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Tricky one to find sources for since most results are either for "DAO" (the crypto thing) or for "my Dao" in the generic sense. The article seems to just be a summary of a couple of studies carried out by one group of researchers, which received relatively few citations and don't seem to have been discussed or replicated elsewhere in the field. I don't see any reason to think this is notable. MCE89 (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete in addition to MCE89's comment, the sources currently used in the article are not great, e.g. a WP:PREPRINT. If you look at the authors 2 names are listed as authors of every single source, Melnyk & Stadnik. So it looks like there are 2 people who promote this stuff and no one else in their field even commented on it. Polygnotus (talk) 08:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.