Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. G. Vartak High School Staff

:{{la|N. G. Vartak High School Staff}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|N. G. Vartak High School Staff}})

PROD'd with the rationale "Completely non-notable list. Unsourced and no coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources so does not pass WP:N." PROD removed by author and a source was added, but the source is published by the school in question so is not independent. PROD rationale still stands, no indication of passing WP:N. Jenks24 (talk) 07:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Jenks24 (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete: per nom. Don't think an article on the list of faculties of an intitution is notable enough. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 11:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Listing some key staff members would be appropriate at the school's article, N. G. Vartak High School, but even there the whole list including all those assistants does not seem notable -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - not-notable. The key members of staff are already listed in the school article. TerriersFan (talk) 13:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable list. Salih (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable list, should be included in school article if covered at all. FieldMarine (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.