Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabela Noor

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Nabela Noor}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Nabela Noor}})

Appears non-notable. The BBC is simply a link to an image of the individual in context of another program, the Rolling Stone article is ok-ish, but brief. Rest are in non-RS and I can't find much else that what is used in the article. Oaktree b (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Maryland, New York, and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
• :Keep multiple sources that prove notability Karnataka (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy Keep There's so many citations from reliable pubs that covers her in depth, such as from People magazine, paper mag, Teen Vogue, allure mag, the daily star, dhaka tribune, anandabazar, the cut, insider, entertainment weekly, and so on. Also, there's many more that aren't included in the article but are on google. I'm just surprised how this can be brought at afd stating lack of notability. Also, the BBC one is just one of the many citations listed, it's not the only major one. It lacks in depth coverage, sure, but not all sources need to be, some can be just secondary/mentioning source used to cover some minor facts or statement. There are other sources that are in depth. It's just cherry-picking one bad source and avoiding the evaluation of the good sources. X (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

• Comment Large parts of this article are from another website and might violate copyright. [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Nabela Noor https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Nabela_Noor] Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 18:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
• :Minor update, I've removed the copyrighted content. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 18:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
• Keep: Adequate press coverage.--Ipigott (talk) 06:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:HEY and WP:GNG. Multiple editors including Xklaponik and Dr_vulpes have helped to fix what was a problematic stub with cut-and-paste copyvio content. Yes, we do see a lot of highly questionable social media influencer bios at AfD, but this one has a lot of coverage in secondary sources including editorial commentary on the content she produces. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
• Keep meets WP:GNG. The person who loves reading (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.