Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nafsika Antypas

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Nafsika Antypas}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Nafsika Antypas}})

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a writer and television personality, not properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for writers or television personalities.
As always, writers and television personalities don't get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, and must pass WP:GNG on their sourceability -- but this is referenced almost entirely to blogs, limited-circulation trade magazines, Q&A interviews in which she's talking about herself in the first person and other content that isn't support for notability at all. The only two genuinely GNG-worthy footnotes in the article (The Times and the Daily Record) are not about her, but just glancingly namecheck her existence as a person who was victimized by the actual subject of those pieces -- which means they don't singlehandedly clinch her notability either, if they're the only genuinely solid and GNG-worthy media hits she has.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Television, and Quebec. Bearcat (talk) 17:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
• Comment She's probably not notable but I must admit it is a fascinating detail in the ongoing saga of former Wikipedia editor Nicholas Alahverdian. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't pass the general notability guidelines.--Darwinek (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• Draftify and improve - She apparently has a reasonably well-regarded show on A&E. The existing article has puffery issues, but The LA Weekly, Daily Record, and Vegan Lifestyle Magazine articles are enough to satisfy the GNG. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 15:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• Draftify I worked on the article a bit in the past. It should have never been moved into the mainspace. A WP:BEFORE check made me think that she was borderline notable, but I have not examined most of the sources for their reliability. Scorpions13256 (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
• Draftify I was going to close this AFD but see that I have already commented upon it so instead I'll just put in a vote to Draftify this article. I think she has borderline notability for your show and, depending on how the Alahverdian story goes, she could have increased public profile as victim of a fraud. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.