Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandnama
=[[Nandnama]]=
:{{la|Nandnama}} – (
:({{Find sources|Nandnama}})
Not notable enough to have an article. No refs.
Apart from unverified claims, this article is poorly written with irrelevant comments (For instance:- Some of the villagers also in very good position in both government and private area. Now new youngster believe to take higher degree like B.Tech, M.Tech, MBA, MCA and working with very reputed organization)
The village really exists but there is no need of articles for every village in India. Harsh (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
:*Comment We don't delete articles just because they are poorly written. Trust me on that one. As for the rest, I'll let someone more knowledgeable on India have that go Яεñ99 (talk) 10:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
::*Re Yes , I understand that. I earlier read some archives in village pump/policy on notability of villages/places and immediately nominated the article, after which I got a reply on what to do about such articles on my talkpage. So according to WP:NPLACE I've made a poor nomination. Harsh (talk) 13:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.