Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanoco

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Nanoco]]=

:{{la|Nanoco}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Nanoco}})

Corporation is not notable and includes information about technology it is working on that is already found in other articles such as Quantum_dots and Quantum_dot_display. All references are related (investors, financial profiles, Nanoco's own website, etc.) to the corporation or do not actually reference the corporation itself. Information regarding solar cells can be added here: Copper_indium_gallium_selenide_solar_cells. The entire article appears to be an attempt by a company to establish a visible presence to investors. The company however is not inherently notable and does not have coverage from secondary sources. Azndragonemperor (talk) 02:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

:Weak uncertainty; news on the company can be found at [http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/10/18/us-nanoco-idUSTRE69H2JP20101018 Reuters], at [http://www.scotsman.com/business/director_dealings_in_the_know_at_nanoco_1_1352504 The Scotsman]. Excess content can be address via editing. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 19:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.