Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napkin PC

:{{la|Napkin PC}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Napkin_PC Stats])

:({{Find sources|Napkin PC}})

Article has few references, has not been edited for over a year, and suffers from clear notability issues. AbsoluteMack (talk) 15:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

• weak delete Notability is not temporary, and it won a fairly decent award, and had good coverage at the time. but I think it fails the WP:10YT pretty hard. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
• Keep: It won a high-profile award and was featured in several magazines. The article may not be relevant in the future (as Gaijin42 pointed out), but for now, I think it should stay. IAmTheBrainwasher (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 00:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

---

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 17:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

---

• Keep - overall, just meets WP:GNG, although some articles that I was able to locate are short. Source examples include: [http://gizmodo.com/340835/napkin-pc-concept-utilizes-multi-touch-e-paper-display-and-rf-technology], [http://www.philstar.com/cebu-lifestyle/427807/new-gadgets-watch-out-2009], [http://books.google.com/books?id=2wEAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA42], [http://www.cnet.com/news/images-death-to-the-beige-box/], [http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/laptop/3221998/fascinating-to-far-fetched-15-concept-laptops/?pn=3], [http://tech.ca.msn.com/photogallery.aspx?cp-documentid=22297996&page=6]. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
• Keep, I'm convinced that the sources provided by Northamerica evidence bare notability under GNG. --j⚛e decker^talk 00:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
• Keep. There are enough reliable sources to establish notability. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.