Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narrative link

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to literary technique. MBisanz ^talk 04:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Narrative link]]=

:{{la|Narrative link}} ([{{fullurl:Narrative link|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narrative link}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This article consists entirely of a definition of an obscure term that is unlikely to be found, much less discussed in detail, in reliable sources. This is not a notable concept. Neelix (talk) 18:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Links are commonly seen in television and narrators are common too, but there's no real point in combining the two. Links in tv shows or plays are usually narrated making the term superfluous. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: maybe this is appropriate for a WikiMediaDictionary, or as section in another related article, but not enough substance to merit an encyclopedia article on its own.-- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Merge to literary technique, or create a more specific list of dramatic techniques and merge to it. A commonly-used dramatic technique, worth noting, but not needing its own article. JulesH (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Merge to literary technique per JulesH sounds like the best compromise between a permastub and a somewhat likely or legitimate search term. – sgeureka ^t•c 14:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.