Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseba (3rd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

=[[Naseba]]=

AfDs for this article:

:{{la|Naseba}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseba (3rd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Naseba}})

No-notable organisation - fails WP:CORP. Cameron Scott (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

:: LOL - on using a script to nom this, it seems that I nommed it last time (where it was deleted for the second time, the first time was in 2008), I guess I forgot about that. I guess this is a G4? --Cameron Scott (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

I saw in previous nomination to be deleted that none of the administrator found press release, articles about us. We are listed on the french "marche libre" since 2006, we are producing 47 events arounds the world, we own the biggest conference company in china and we are the most present event company for B2B in Middle east. Finally we host the biggest air show in Egypt. We might not have the time to publish press release to make public knowing us but we are one of the leader in our industry. Could I someone explaining me what are the reasons behind the deletion of my company article. Romain Tordo - email : romaint@naseba.com

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romaintordo (talk • contribs) 04:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete unless references that establish notability are found. Press releases and other promotional materials do not, I think, meet the criteria. The article is not neutral in tone, and the author appears to have a conflict of interest. Hope that helps, --Nuujinn (talk) 23:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.