Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasty Little Man

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

=[[Nasty Little Man]]=

:{{la|Nasty Little Man}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nasty_Little_Man Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nasty Little Man}})

Previously deleted under PROD and later contested post mortum.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Nasty_Little_Man]. As stated by the restoring editor, notability is not inherited. Company appears to have 1-10 employees[https://www.linkedin.com/company/nasty-little-man]. CorporateM (Talk) 03:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC) CorporateM (Talk) 03:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:46, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete. A search brought up the PR firm in passing ([http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/15/jack-white-open-letter-guacamole_n_6689040.html], [http://www.stereogum.com/1706155/foo-fighters-sort-of-respond-to-jack-white-dis-jack-white-sort-of-apologizes/news/], [http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2015/02/24/nearly-14-itunes-users-listened-u2-january]) but not really anything that truly focuses on the firm itself. Other than them being the inspiration for the song Hello, Nasty and some mild coverage about [http://www.billboard.com/articles/events/grammys-2015/6465738/beck-grammys-album-year-pr-firm-nasty-little-man NLM having a catfight with another record company], there really is nothing out there and the aforementioned claims to fame aren't even remotely enough to warrant having an article. This is pretty much a classic example of WP:NOTINHERITED where you have someone/something that deals with notable people but none of those deals ever translated into coverage for the PR firm. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete - the problem is that there are bits and pieces, but nothing really rising to the level of coverage we need for a subject to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. That's not to say it might not be notable in the future, but for now, I don't think it's there. St★lwart¹¹¹ 06:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.