Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Agrama (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Natasha Agrama}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Natasha_Agrama_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Natasha Agrama}})

Undersourced BLP with no evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC. First nom was no consenus for lack of attention. —Swpb^talk 21:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 00:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete for now - Aw, I wish I had been here for the first nomination to say delete, a news search [https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=Natasha+Agrama&gws_rd=ssl found] a few results but nothing significant. Books, Highbeam and thefreelibrary found no results. She may have played with those people but that's not to say she's notable herself (no significant and notable coverage). SwisterTwister talk 20:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. Substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources is not provided or to be found. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete The sources provided are not reliable and do not illustrate the subject's notability, and an internet search shows nothing of value. BenLinus1214^talk 01:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.