Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Bucklin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 10:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

=[[Nate Bucklin]]=

:{{la|Nate Bucklin}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nate_Bucklin Stats])

:({{Find sources|Nate Bucklin}})

No indication of noteability provided through third party sources. A google search reveals nothing that meets the noteability criteria. Page only contains primary sources and some of them are broken links (one actually links to a Livejournal post). Jtrainor (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

You know perfectly well, Jtrainor, that third party sources used to exist and have disappeared from the web due to a falling-out between Mr. Bucklin and the former maintainer of his web presence. Nate Bucklin has been a fixture of the Minnesota fan community for years, and he is a published musician with two albums out on CD and several others on cassette. That is plenty notable enough from a historical-record perspective, even if there aren't any current links to demonstrate it. Wpell (talk) 05:56, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

:How can such a falling-out possibly affect the existence of third party sources, which are, by definition, not part of Bucklin's web presence? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 19:57, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Delete - I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. A google book search confirms he is activf in SF being thanked a lot in author notes in books but that does not translate into notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.