Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Justice

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Natural Justice]]=

:{{la|Natural Justice}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Natural_Justice Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Natural Justice}})

Page is for an organisation presumably defunct, no cites, the two external links don't lead anywhere and nothing coming up in search apart from a listing, and several organisations of the same name, to confuse the issue. Mramoeba (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Comment If this article isn't kept then I'd recommend redirecting it back to Natural justice which it was before this article was created in 2006. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 23:43, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete. This organization is now known as The Institute for Food, Brain, and Behavior... but doesn't seem to have received any more coverage under that identity. There are a ton of other Natural Justices out there. The most prominent seems to be a South African legal org, but I'm not convinced of notability there either. No objection to the proposed redirect. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment. Once notable, always notable. A defunct notable organization does not lose its notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete. The "homepage" that this article links to had advice on getting "personal injury lawyers"? There is no notability here. Britishfinance (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete - Does not appear to meet WP:NORG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete The subject seems not to establish notability.89ezagonoszkommunistanacionalista64 (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.