Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Resources Use in Kasulu

:{{la|Natural Resources Use in Kasulu}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Natural_Resources_Use_in_Kasulu Stats])

:({{Find sources|Natural Resources Use in Kasulu}})

Personal essay, synthesis. All of the author's contributions to Wikipedia have been essays about poverty in Tanzania. More appropriate places for such content would be scientific papers, newspaper reader comments pages, or a personal blog. Delete. JIP | Talk 19:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Very blatant personal essay and/or WP:NOR. Specs112 t c 20:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia is not for original research or essays; this would belong more properly in some sort of peer-reviewed journal or, as suggested above, various other fora for original thought. No reliable sources, no notability. Ubelowme (talk) 20:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
• Keep and Move to Natural resources use in Kasulu, or perhaps Natural resources use in Tanzania, with the section on Kasulu made into a subsection.

:"Natural resource use" gets a zillion hits, as the primary descriptor of a country by :Category:Development scholars-:({{Find sources|Natural resources use}}). There are no other articles on WP with this focus, and no category by that name. By comparison, there are articles on minute details of :Category:Microeconomics: Sonnenschein–Mantel–Debreu theorem, Surface Freight Forwarder Deregulation Act of 1986. Well documented start to a long overdue series of articles, one per country-not the first time the newbies have come and shown the experts what needs to be done. Anarchangel (talk) 02:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

---

• Speedy keep Meets WP: GNG. This article has many citations from reliable sources. How is this original research? Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:16, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
• Keep and move per Anarchangel. See the AFD for this user's other article. He needs to spend some serious quality time with WP:MOS and WP:TONE, but there's encyclopedic content hiding behind the essay format. --BDD (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

• Keep{{spaced ndash}} The topic passes WP:GNG:

:* Maganga F. P, Butterworth J. and Moriarty (2001): Domestic Water Supply, Competition for Water Resources and IWRM in Tanzania: A Review and discussion Paper, Proceedings of the Second WARFSA/Waternet Symponsium, Cape town, pp. 169 – 78.

:* Kauzeni A.S, Kikula I. S, Mohamed S.A & Lyimo J. G (December 1993), IIED Environmental Planning Issues No. 3 IRA Research Paper No. 35: Land Use Planning and Resource Assessment in Tanzania: A Case Study.

:* Tenga, R. (1992): Pastoral Land Rights in Tanzania: A Review. Drylands Programme: Pastoral Land Tenure Series. IIED, London. 24 pp.

:* James, R.W. and Fimbo, G.M. (1973): Customary Land Law of Tanzania: A Sourcebook, Nairobi, EALB.

:* World Bank (1992): Empowering Villages to Manage their Natural Resources: Rural Land Policy in Tanzania; A World Bank White Cover Paper; 33 pp.

::{{mdash}}Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

• Merge to Kasulu and Tanzania; doesn't merit its own article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
• Keep - per Northamerica1000.Tamsier (talk) 14:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.