Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naugaon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Naugaon]]=

:{{la|Naugaon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Naugaon Stats])

:({{Find sources|Naugaon}})

fails WP:N Go Phightins! (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep Clearly not one of the world's biggest populated places, but a town whose existence can be confirmed and has potential encyclopaedic importance (though needing significant enhancement to the current text). I've added a couple of sources found via Google Books. AllyD (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. The "x is a village" entries are some of the worst content on Wikipedia, there are hundreds of them and many of them are garbled, barely coherent and unsourced; occasionally I will redirect one to its parent region if the entry seems unsalvageable. This one has been improved since the nomination, and general practice (for good or for bad) is that any populated region named on a map is notable. See Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) for a discussion, (although note that it's a discussion and not policy). Hairhorn (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep This is a well-referenced settlement and is therefore notable by a long-standing AfD consensus. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:39, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

::Well I would hardly call that one line article well referenced, but if you say so...Go Phightins! (talk) 23:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.