Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveed Afzal Haq

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is no consensus to delete. Merge discussion can continue on the article's talk page. (non-admin closure) Pcap ping 23:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

=[[Naveed Afzal Haq]]=

:{{la|Naveed Afzal Haq}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveed Afzal Haq}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Naveed Afzal Haq}})

WP:BLP1E - article is well-cited, but the only evidence of notability is the Seattle Jewish Federation shooting for which he was convicted of murder. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Merge to Seattle Jewish Federation shooting. The only other section in the article, Naveed_Afzal_Haq#Background_and_early_years, does not indicate anything else that would make him notable, which qualifies this article for BLP1E. However, there is a good amount of sourced information in the article, which would be a shame to lose. NW (Talk) 20:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Merge to Seattle Jewish Federation shooting. Agree with NW that there is some good, sourced information in this article worth keeping, but he has no notability independent of the crime he is convicted of committing (WP:PERPETRATOR). —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Merge but needs to be ensured that much of the material is properly transferred to the main article. Should even have a section on the bio of the shooter, but without undue weight. Plot Spoiler (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep This is sufficiently significant to be part of the historical record, and thus escapes BLP 1E DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep, especially if other perpetrators of heinous crimes have their own articles separate from their crimes.Alan (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep and propose a merge/redirect on the talk pages of the two articles first. Bring it back here if that doesn't work. --Elliskev 14:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Merge Crime is not inherently notable + WP:BIO1E. --Bejnar (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.