Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navin Khambhala
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 02:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Navin Khambhala]]=
:{{la|Navin Khambhala}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Navin Khambhala}})
Not a particularly notable YouTube personality. Of the six references, four are actually all the same article which briefly mentions this person in a long list of educational YouTube people, one is a staff directory listing, and the other is an Amazon listing for a book they wrote (actually Lambert Academic Publishing publishes academic papers without providing editorial oversight or even proofreading, they pay their "authors" with one free copy of their book and are known to reprint Wikipedia articles as books) . Not very compelling. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
::{{Comment}} An anon has posted a keep reason on Navin Khambhala's talk page. I tried to get them to post their views here, but they decided to add a more detailed reason as to why it should be kept. I however have no opinion on to whether or not this page should be kept. Sakuura Cartelet Talk 20:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:PERSON, and WP:PROMO. --Joshualouie711talk 01:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This is one of thousands of YouTubers. Bearian (talk) 22:55, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No coverage apart from a brief mention in an article in The Hindu. — Stringy Acid (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable YouTubers.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.