Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naziphobia (2nd nomination)

=[[Naziphobia]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naziphobia}}

:{{la|Naziphobia}} ([{{fullurl:Naziphobia|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naziphobia (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

contested prod, no information given, made up word. Man It's So Loud In Here (talk) 23:42, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete borderline speedy, there's no content here at all. JuJube (talk) 23:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NEO. Appears to be an entirely non-notable neologism and the definition given in the article gives it the appearance of a hoax. Nsk92 (talk) 23:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - per WP:NFT. Last AfD also ended as a delete --T-rex 00:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 00:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as "BS" a.k.a non-notable term made up one day with no notability or reliable 3rd party sources for verifiability. Also if content is substantially the same as previous article than it is a speedy candidate. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete; probably WP:NEO, but even if it is not, WP is not a dictionary, and this article is little more than a definition. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Neutral - good topic, probably bad name for it, too short. --Dezidor (talk) 12:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Nein Fails WP:NEO. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.