Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neal Phillip

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

=[[Neal Phillip]]=

:{{la|Neal Phillip}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neal Phillip}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Neal Phillip}})

Fails WP:Academic; only published two papers (one as NH Phillip). Autobiographical too! Chris (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete. My own Google scholar searches match the nominator's statement about the paucity of his publications. He does not pass WP:PROF#C1 nor, it seems, does he pass any other of the WP:PROF criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete, per David Eppstein. Also, as the nominator notes, the article was created by User:Nphillip91, so looks to be a WP:AUTO case. Nsk92 (talk) 06:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.