Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neelapu Rami Reddy

=[[Neelapu Rami Reddy]]=

:{{la|Neelapu Rami Reddy}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neelapu Rami Reddy}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Neelapu Rami Reddy}})

There only seems to be one article on the subject that has been copied onto several sites. [http://www.hindu.com/mp/2009/05/14/stories/2009051450130300.htm] I don't think it merits a speedy deletion, and I'd like to see what others think. HarlandQPitt 05:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep The user provided 3 reliable sources. This person clearly passess WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. I will try to add another source.  Chzz  ►  17:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak keep' as a national champion under WP:ATHLETE. The issue, in this case, is not whether the sources are reliable, but whether they constitute significant coverage. They don't. However, I believe that an investigation of paper sources for the time period will produce results. --Bejnar (talk) 18:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Seems to pass WP:ATHLETE. A claim to notability is present, and sources are added that verify these claims. I would have preferred a bit more diversified sourcing, but it works for now. As Bejnar mentioned - there are likely offline sources as well. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 22:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep passes WP:ATHLETE and WP:NSPORT#Generally_acceptable_standards Traxs7 (Talk) 00:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment on my initial search I had searched under "Neelapu Rami Reddy" and "Neelapu Reddy". It seems that in two of these sources, he is referred to as "Rami Reddy". In light of this information, I think the nomination can be withdrawn. HarlandQPitt 02:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep looks good to me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.