Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Danzig

:{{la|Neil Danzig}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neil_Danzig Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Neil Danzig}})

Does not meet notability guidelines —Boruch Baum (talk) 18:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

• Rename to Neil Gdansk, surely? Claudebone (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

::: @Claudebone -- very droll. Quis separabit? 03:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. I presume that this person's notability would come from his academic work. But I don't see how he comes close to satisfying WP:NACADEMICS. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete: as insufficiently notable academician. Quis separabit? 03:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete for now as although I found some results here and there, there's nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.