Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson Shaw

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Nelson Shaw]]=

:{{la|Nelson Shaw}} ([{{fullurl:Nelson Shaw|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson Shaw}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Appears to be a WP:HOAX. If not a hoax, this individual certainly fails notability criteria for WP:BIO with only two self-published books. An internet search finds no results [http://www.google.dk/search?hl=en&q=%22Son+of+Hell%22+%22Nelson+Shaw%22&btnG=Search], [http://www.google.dk/search?hl=en&q=%22The+Damned+and+the+White%22+Nelson+Shaw&btnG=Search], or even the reference [http://www.google.dk/search?hl=en&q=%22Langy%3A+life%2C+death+and+triumphs%22&btnG=Search]. — User:CactusWriter ^needles 14:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — — User:CactusWriter ^needles 15:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I checked by searching as the nominator did, and also checked a library database of newspaper and magazine articles and could find no evidence of the existence of this person. Delete. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Strong Delete - No evidence of notability, nothing on Google. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete unable to verify. Plastikspork (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete. -Whataworld06 (talk) 21:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.