Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neta Bomani

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The page creator has been blocked as a sockpuppet, if anyone else wants to work on this article, I can move it into your User space. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Neta Bomani]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Neta Bomani}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Neta Bomani}})

A [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Neta+Bomani%22&sxsrf=ALiCzsZ9Mmgl_15OPM7nVpzrxhaaI3Zd3A:1668914903271&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiYtuC_6Lv7AhV3JUQIHbJJATUQ_AUoAnoECAIQBA&biw=1093&bih=462&dpr=1.25 Google News] search turns up only 17 hits, none of which seem to confer notability. LinkedIn notwithstanding. A loose necktie (talk) 03:31, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete This article has a vaguely promotional tone, but I can't find any RS we can use. She's mentioned in passing in relation to other subjects. Oaktree b (talk) 03:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete - Lacks WP:SIGCOV and WP:INDEPENDENT reliable sources, also seems to be promotional Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Artists, Women, and New York. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep She was a resident at Eyebeam, which has a $20,000 award attached,{{cite news|url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/eyebeam-new-fellowship-program-2026181|work=Artnet|title=How Can Nonprofits Better Serve Artists? With a New $1.5 Million Program, Eyebeam Is Turning Over the Purse Strings to Its Fellows|date=27 October 2021|last=Dafoe|first=Taylor}} has shown at competitive performance venue the Kitchen in New York and has been mentioned in Artnet. I'm also continuing to work on this. How many of you have long experience in editing articles about the contemporary art world, particularly of BIPOC artists? Or even created one article on a BIPOC artist? It would behoove our site if you'd take a few moments to reflect on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia your possible biases].--NerdyThursdays (talk) 18:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
  • :Biases are not a good thing, but we need coverage in reliable sources that discuss the subject at length. We can't conduct research ourselves, so this is what we have. The article is somewhat promotional; I'm more concerned that she hasn't garnered critical attention. How she identifies is secondary to coverage, otherwise she's an artist trying to make a mark on the landscape, not unlike many hundreds of others of all varieties of humandkind.Oaktree b (talk) 15:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

{{reflist}}

  • Delete No coverage found, Artnet is about the best one. LinkedIn isn't a valid source and the others are from the establishment where she "works" in the art sense of the word. Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

:fyi {{u|Oaktree b}}, you already made a bolded !vote above. Beccaynr (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

:: I've crossed out the first one. Ooops. Oaktree b (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

  • Userfy so {{u|NerdyThursdays}} can continue developing the article. Based on my research, it appears WP:TOOSOON to support WP:BASIC or WP:CREATIVE notability, but Bomani continues to exhibit work, e.g. [https://tribeza.com/art-pick-meet-hands-neta-bomani/], [https://www.austinchronicle.com/events/arts/visual-arts/meet-her-hands-3-neta-bomani-2012383/], which indicates a likelihood of secondary support, such as reviews and other coverage, continuing to develop in the future. Beccaynr (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider draftifying or userfication. I also don't recommend accusing participants of having a bias, it's not a successful strategy of persuading others to your point of view.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete It appears to be WP:TOOSOON as I'm not seeing any in-depth reliable source coverage. Curiocurio (talk) 18:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.