Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevada Lynx

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 2012 American Indoor Football season. Something had to be decided, and since the content has already been merged, we might as well go with this. The deletion of the redirect can be pursued at RFD.‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Arbitrarily0 (talk) 08:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

=[[:{{#titleparts:Nevada Lynx}}]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{#titleparts:Nevada Lynx}}}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1={{#titleparts:Nevada Lynx}}}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title={{#titleparts:Nevada Lynx}}}})

Fails WP:NSPORTS, this team did almost nothing before folding, not to mention all the sources about the team, which were brief of the team, have pretty much faded. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

:Delete. doesn't have enough proper sources to establish notability. Darkm777 (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different Redirect/Merge Proposed target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

  • Comment: I had a look to see if I could break the tie, and I don't think American Indoor Football#Former teams is a great target, since it's just a list that tells you nothing. If that's the outcome, it's better just to delete (the results from the search function would be better). 2012 American Indoor Football season could take the merge... I guess? It will be imbalanced, because that's not a very well-developed article. But I don't really see any compelling reason to delete the paragraph of text -- provided it can be sourced. Right now the sources are not... great. So all of this is to say: delete? Unless someone pulls a WP:HEY, which I kind of doubt is going to happen. -- asilvering (talk) 00:30, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.