Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newdawgery

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mgm|^(talk) 09:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Newdawgery]]=

:{{la|Newdawgery}} ([{{fullurl:Newdawgery|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newdawgery}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

A declined speedy and then a disputed prod. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this term seems obscure and not notable anyway. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete Not a dictionary. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete - the very definition of a dicitonary definition - Whpq (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete. Actually a hoax. Ottre 03:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Probably just nonsense, but at best is a dictionary definition. Aleta ^Sing 04:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.