Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NexGen Storage

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 01:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

=[[:NexGen Storage]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=NexGen Storage}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=NexGen Storage}})

They do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Most of the references are paid press releases. Daringsmith (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete seeing as how there is already a mention in the Fusion-io article, references fails NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 15:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.