Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NiKarma

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:57, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[NiKarma]]=

:{{la|NiKarma}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/NiKarma Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|NiKarma}})

I would've basically PRODed too since none of this is actually convincing of any applicable notability and my searches have unsurprisingly found nothing at all therefore there's nothing at all to suggest this is salvageable. Notifying 2010 tagger {{U|Gilo1969}}. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete This is a promotional article for an entertainer who happens to have in the past been an NCAA gymnast, but that is not what is driving her notability here, the article exists to get clients and is written with that goal. Wikipedia is not an advertising service, so we should delete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep as seems notable for representing the U.S in gymnastics for three years, rather than the entertainment aspect, article can be edited so it is not promotional. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete the only legitimate claim to notability appears to be the US Gymnastics team membership, and not every person that's ever been on the team is automatically notable. Nothing else suggests subject ever did anything to reach the required level of notability while on the team. LAroboGuy (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete. I'm not seeing the notability here. In particular, I don't see how any of the criteria under WP:NGYMNAST have been met. As for notability as an entertainer, the subject doesn't come close. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

:The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.