Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Monteleone

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 11:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Nick Monteleone]]=

:{{la|Nick Monteleone}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nick_Monteleone Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nick Monteleone}})

Notability does not meet guidelines for geberal blp or musicians. Sources can't be located for the majority of content and the article appears to have been created by a single purpose account close to the subject.--Sizzla77 (talk) 01:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Delete there do not appear to be WP:RS for this subject. I can't tell if it is a hoax or just a non-notable subject.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Comment: I don't think it's a hoax – he appears to have a LinkedIn profile as well: [https://www.linkedin.com/in/nickmonteleone]. Whether he's notable or not, that's another matter. Richard3120 (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete Apparent vanity page created by an SPA editor that has gone undetected for 8 years. ShelbyMarion (talk) 12:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.