Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Carlin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 06:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

=[[Nicole Carlin]]=

:{{la|Nicole Carlin}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicole_Carlin Stats])

:({{Find sources|Nicole Carlin}})

Doesn't appear to meet WP:AUTH, two self-published books doesn't meet criteria. Not sure about the magazine. [http://popfizzacademy.com/] isn't mentioned in article, but has more info on subject. C1776MTalk 00:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - Not notable as above. Further, the magazine reference is an e-magazine that will not even be published until May, 2014. The link above should be http://popfizzacademy.com/60/ which shows that the magazine and the two books are/will be published by popfizzacademy.com. It seems unlikely to be a coincidence that this article was created by the single puprose account user:popfizzacademy. Maybe a speedy promo? Meters (talk) 01:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:I don't believe it meets the WP:CSD, but I definitely agree that it's WP:COI, that's why I included the link. C1776MTalk 01:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

::Yup, that's why I left it as a delete rather than a speedy delete. File creator now listed at wp:UAA Meters (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Ah, I misread your previous comment "speedy promo"→promote to speedy. Got it now. C1776MTalk 01:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

  • I've tidied up the article, just in case, but support delete for reasons stated above. Emeraude (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete Obvious self-promotion page, I actually think it would meet CSD-A7. Also, account creator has been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Popfizzacademy blocked] for spamming. Vectro (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.