Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Peters (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Nicole Peters]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Peters}}

:{{la|Nicole Peters}} ([{{fullurl:Nicole Peters|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Peters (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Second nomination for deletion. No reliable sources to verify notability according to WP:PORNBIO. Awards not well known. Score and Voluptuous Magazine "awards" are not covered in independent reliable sources similar to "Playboy Playmate" or "Penthouse Pet". Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - No sources to verify she meets WP:PORNBIO. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep She's notable as a big-bust model and has won a few awards, meets (barely) WP:PORNBIO--2008Olympian _chitchat^seemywork 04:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete No independent reliable secondary sources proves her notability. Tosqueira (talk) 19:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per Tosqueira. Stifle (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete as insufficiently notable. No evidence of non-trivial coverage by reliable, third-party published sources. — Satori Son 14:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.