Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Pennick

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Nigel Pennick}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Pennick}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Nigel Pennick}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 14:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Nigel Pennick]]=

:{{la|1=Nigel Pennick}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Nigel Pennick}})

Tagged for notability since 2010. Lack of valid sources. Fails WP:AUTHOR. UtherSRG (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, United Kingdom, and England. UtherSRG (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.