Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Sixsmith

:{{la|Nigel Sixsmith}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nigel_Sixsmith Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nigel Sixsmith}})

Unable to find significant coverage independent of the subject of this BLP, do not believe the page meets GNG nor do I believe it meets the criteria of MUSICBIO. J04n(talk page) 12:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

• Delete. Agree and would suggest the closely-related The Art of Sound is equally worthy of deletion. Nedrutland (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. No references at present, and though I tried several web searches I found no independent reliable sources to satisfy WP:ANYBIO. Qwfp (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per above - Fails GNG.–Davey2010 • (talk) 17:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
• Delete sounds like a nice guy, but fails to have any real coverage. Fails :WP:NOTEBLP and :WP:MUSIC for lack of coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 05:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.