Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Watson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Nigel Watson]]=

:{{la|Nigel Watson}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Nigel Watson}})

Seems to fail WP:BIO and possibly WP:VANITY. No notice outside of the WP:FRINGE community, therefore we cannot write a Wikipedia article about him. jps (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Keep - per references.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Ummm, no. That's not really a valid keep rationale. The references in the article are not to WP:FRINGE#Independent sources and cannot be used to establish external notability. We need independent sources that can identify this character as notable. jps (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete - article was created by User:Magonia, who in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nigel_Watson&action=historysubmit&diff=64009060&oldid=63933707 this edit] remarked that image added someone put wrong pic of me on site - looks like WP:VANITY. Autarch (talk) 02:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, WP:AUTO, WP:SPAM, WP:COI, WP:SPA, and of course WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 20:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.