Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilbog

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. I have redirected to Goblin (Dungeons & Dragons), knowledgeable editors are encouraged to merge relevant, cited information. seresin | wasn't he just...? 07:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Nilbog]]=

:{{la|Nilbog}} ([{{fullurl:Nilbog|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilbog}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non notable Dungeons & Dragons monster. May deserve a mention at the article on D&D goblins, may not. Not quite sure of the nature of the Necromancer Games source, but I can be almost certain that the 'nilbog in other media' lists unrelated uses of the word. J Milburn (talk) 10:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete — non-notable. Mention in a list. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge into D&D article - non-notable, so it should be merged. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 14:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep Notable. Added some cites to demonstrate notability and potential. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge into Goblin (Dungeons & Dragons), since they are basically a weird type of goblin and that article has a better chance of being notable. --Ig8887 (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Eteled. Unless cites can be found, we don't have a leg to stand on here Weak Keep thanks to cites. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v :L13 ½-Raichu Soulknife)} 18:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Colonel Warden. --Oldak Quill 20:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge into Goblin (Dungeons & Dragons) per Ig8887. — Nova Dog — (contribs) 20:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Colonel Warden~~, or merge into Goblin (Dungeons & Dragons)~~. BOZ (talk) 20:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
A merge has been performed, thanks to Webwarlock. It can be simply redirected to Goblin (Dungeons & Dragons) if not kept. BOZ (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge and Redirect to Goblin (Dungeons & Dragons). shadzar-talk 21:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep or 'Merge''' as per BOZ. Eithin (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge into Goblin (Dungeons & Dragons). -Sean Curtin (talk) 00:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 11:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete no secondary coverage. Fails WP:N, WP:RPG/N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 11:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Realizing you've been cutting and pasting that for the last N edits, you _did_ bother reading this and seeing that there is secondary coverage, right? Hobit (talk) 02:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
It seems that he didn't and so his comment should be discounted as false. Colonel Warden (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge to goblin, but the nilbog use outside of D&D should be kept in the merger. Hobit (talk) 02:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I'll turn this into a dab page once it has been deleted. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Minor component of fictional work, per WP:FICT. Vague mention in a movie review in the Salt Lake City tribune isn't enough to justify a separate article. --John Nagle (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.