Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nima Rahman

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Nima Rahman]]=

:{{la|Nima Rahman}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nima_Rahman Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nima Rahman}})

Does not meet notability criteria for actors (WP:NACTOR) - no "major role in multiple notable films", no awards. — kashmiri ^TALK 07:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 12:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 12:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep: Have enough sources for pass WP:GNG. She have significant roles in multiple notable feature films, television shows, and several stage performances. Also she have popular music albums alongside with Anjan Dutt. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

:* {{comment}} They were all minor roles; none was a major role as required by NACTOR. The album does not pass WP:NMUSIC either. Likely WP:TOOSOON. — kashmiri ^TALK 01:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Weak delete. Minor roles, WP:TOOSOON, fails WP:NACTOR. There is however some Bengali coverage, but it's hard to say how reliable/in-depth it is. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:24, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete - might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but as the nom points out, no significant roles as of yet. Sourcing doesn't go into the depth required to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.