Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nine Sons Of Dan
=[[Nine Sons Of Dan]]=
:{{la|Nine Sons Of Dan}} – (
:({{Find sources|Nine Sons Of Dan}})
Does not establish notability Reichsfürst (talk) 22:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. As I noted three weeks ago on the article's talk page, "The article only has one reference, and it doesn't really support much of the article, since it's a quote from a review." There has been no response to that, so I can only conclude that the sources just don't exist. Accordingly, the article should be deleted for failing the notability and verifiability guidelines (as well as the WP:BAND specific notability guideline). —C.Fred (talk) 14:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Unexceptional band, does not satisfy any criteria at WP:BAND. WWGB (talk) 00:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Not much coverage, but I'd say it met WP:BAND #4, "Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country." Recent tours get more than a passing mention in the free music press. Needs quite a bit of work, though.Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Run-of-the-mill. Neutralitytalk 05:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.