Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninjaspy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" doesn't address the arguments for deletion.  Sandstein  09:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[Ninjaspy]]=

:{{la|Ninjaspy}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ninjaspy Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Ninjaspy}})

I almost even speedied and/or PRODed this as there's simply hardly much but considering there are a few reviews, I'll simply take it here. The best my searches found were only [https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#hl=en&q=Ninjaspy+skankore+experimental+heavy+metal+Port+Coquitlam+British+Columbia+Canada this] which is quite hardly much. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment. Ninja code of honor says I can't vote to delete this. But I did find [http://www.straight.com/article-365205/vancouver/fans-dead-eyes-open-southern-death-threat-and-ninjaspy-get-crazy-media-club this article] at The Georgia Straight. Do reviews of live performances count toward notability? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:52, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep: Let's keep the article but, get more sources and do proper detailed citations. Garagepunk66 (talk) 03:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

::The question, however, is not the current state of the article, but whether more third-party reliable sources even exist. Mz7 (talk) 01:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. The issue isn't just one of sourcing -- I'm not seeing any credible claim to notability here. A self-published album and EP doesn't do it. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.