Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nir Eyal (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Nir Eyal}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nir_Eyal_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nir Eyal}})

Still not meeting WP:BIO or WP:AUTHOR. They have a new book out, but what [https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-masterclasses/2019/jun/20/how-to-focus-in-an-age-of-distraction-a-masterclass-with-silicon-valley-expert-nir-eyal-culture-business-digital-course appears] to be coverage in the Guardian is in fact him running a "masterclass" i.e. not independent or reliable. SmartSE (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Would it be acceptable to replace the Guardian citation with either of the following? https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/333412 or https://www.fastcompany.com/40579601/this-behavioral-designers-top-brain-hacks-for-beating-distraction ? Both reference the same information and may be considered more independent and reliable, yes? Even if those replacement citations won't work and the info about his second good needs to be removed he still qualifies as notable under WP:AUTHOR since he developed the "hook model" and has been cited a fair amount on Google scholar: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C50&q=%22Hooked%3A+How+to+build+habit-forming+products%22&btnG= Scruitineer (talk) 13:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

:{{article creator|Scruitineer}}

• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

:Thank you for weighing in. I obviously disagree, but would you mind at least elaborating on why you don't think the subject meets WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR? I would like to better understand why this page is going to get deleted when, in my view, the subject meets (exceeds?) those thresholds for a page. Thanks in advance for any explanation you're able to provide, and again I appreciate you weighing in. Scruitineer (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:GNG. While there may or may not be some COI issues going on with this article, the subject of the article is in fact notable. He was the subject of a segment on NPR (see [https://www.npr.org/2019/07/12/740824015/nir-eyal-how-easy-is-it-to-unhook-ourselves-from-our-devices here]), an article in Forbes (see [https://www.forbes.com/sites/barnabylashbrooke/2019/09/17/nir-eyal-tech-addiction-isnt-real-you-just-need-to-be-indistractable/#703a17721079 here]), Arab News (see [https://www.arabnews.com/node/1557756/lifestyle here]), and is an on air contributor for CNBC (see [https://www.cnbc.com/nir-eyal/ here]) in addition to the things already mentioned in the article.4meter4 (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.