Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Deal

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|No Deal}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/No_Deal Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|No Deal}})

Dab with one valid entry (or arguably zero valid entries as all being WP:PTM) 1. primary topic Brexit negotiations#The "no deal" scenario where the redirects No deal Brexit, No-deal Brexit target (there's no lowercase no deal). Two other (sub) entries but all the same topic. Dab title is malformed as titlecase, with 1 valid entry, and linking to the other entries is at the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC target either as normal links, or hatnote see also. Suggest deletion (readers inputting "no deal" aren't even obviously wanting the Brexit topic, they may desire the general concept so search is preferred with only WP:PTM). Widefox; talk 20:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC) Widefox; talk 21:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

::Nom withdrawn (per comment below). Widefox; talk 09:06, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Widefox; talk 20:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Widefox; talk 20:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Widefox; talk 20:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Widefox; talk 20:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Widefox; talk 20:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

It would be fine to just redirect to the same place as No deal Brexit. The title may seem malformed but it is a common spelling. —ajf (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

:Oh, right, that's how I originally created it, as such a redirect. So obviously I have my bias here. :) —ajf (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

• Keep: (edit conflict) In my opinion what a bloody stupid place to claim No Deal should redirect to as primary topic mainly for the reason its not in the greatest place in the middle of a negotiations article. My impression is {{U|Widefox}}'s tinkering with such as is making a mess a bigger mess; though to a degree I created the mess that is Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit. There are also issues over {{noredirect|No-deal Brexit}}. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

::WP:AGF / WP:CIVIL ignored. Normal day in the office for me - routine cleanup of dabs - check my history. This dab is bad in pretty much every way, and should be deleted. It actually misleads readers who are after "no deal Brexit" into thinking there's three topics, rather than giving those readers what they want, which is the primary topic. Why on earth readers would be typing "No Deal" (titlecase) when they want Brexit is beyond me, can you explain. It's a dab with title issue, and no valid entries. Widefox; talk 21:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

• Keep (and move to No deal, with the capitalized version redirecting there). There are at least two significant meanings, one being the concept of a no-deal Brexit, and the other being "No deal" as an aspect of gameplay in Deal or No Deal. Although it is not specifically a title match, it does meet WP:DABMENTION. bd2412 T 02:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
• Note: I have added a third meaning: "No Deal", a song written by Townes Van Zandt and recorded on the 1983 Guy Clark album Better Days. bd2412 T 02:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

::Well done, dab has valid entries now, nom withdrawn. Widefox; talk 09:06, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.