Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel Andrews
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Based on improvements, consensus is to keep the panda ₯’ 10:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
=[[Noel Andrews]]=
:{{la|Noel Andrews}} – (
:({{Find sources|Noel Andrews}})
My original prod stated: "This person doesn't seem to pass WP:N, failing WP:BIO including Wikipedia:Notability (creative professionals) requirements." A radio journalist; references are limited to a four-line obituary. Nothing suggests this person achieved anything warranting inclusion in an encyclopedia in his life. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Keep: actually he was very well known for his assocaition with boxing and RTÉ though not so much recently which may be why online sources don't cover his career well. It certainly need expanding and I found greater details [http://www.independent.ie/regionals/wicklowpeople/news/boxing-commentator-noel-andrews-is-laid-to-rest-27859023.html here] for a start off (no time to do tis myself now though). ww2censor (talk) 09:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
:That's an interesting source, through one obituary is not enough, I think. Can you find more sources? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
:Keep: I've extended the article, added more detailed sources. It's enough for this article to stay Mrluke485 (talk) 21:40 23 May 2014 (CET)
Keep: sufficient notability, shown by the newspaper sources. - SchroCat (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.