Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noreen Lace

:{{la|Noreen Lace}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Noreen_Lace Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Noreen Lace}})

None of this has been published or anthologized by a major press, and I do not see any significant critical attention. DGG ( talk ) 08:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - I don't find mentions in large papers, indicating that WP:NBIO or WP:NAUTHOR is likely failing. —PaleoNeonate – 08:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete no claim to notability made on the new page on a contemporary writer, aside from a list of publicaiotn. No secondary sources appear in a news search, and the first page of a general search shows no secondary sourcing. Worse, the small press that published the books doesn't bring up secondary sources when searched. I didn't dig deep because it's rarely productive when early searches produce nothing. She has published a little fiction in small literary mags. That's not enough to pass WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. This is an unsourced CV. Agricola44 (talk) 17:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.